Liste de mes favoris et mes coups de coeur informatiques !

I - Systèmes d'exploitations :

1- Linux (complet, professionnel, opensource, communauté dynamiques, une centaine ou plus de distributions)
2- Solaris (Puissant, hautes performances (surtout java), sécurisé)
3- MacOS X (Apple Inc.,, Software de ronommée et professionnel)
4- Windows (Rien à dire)
5- ***BSD (autre dérivation d'unix.)

II- Langages de programmations compilés :

1- Java (le meilleur, parfait, opensource, puissant, sécurisé, beau)
2- C/C++ (Professionnel, puissant)
3- Pascal/Delphi (Simple, puissant)
4- Assembleur (Pour comprendre la machine ou programmer un virus)
5- Fortran (Indispensable pour les mathématiciens)

III- Constructeur hardware PC:

1- HP (Les meilleurs aujourd'hui)
2- Sony (Haut de gamme)
3- Toshiba (Abordable et satisfaisant)
4- MSI (meilleure carte mère du monde)
5- DELL (Offre compétitive et garantie efficace en Europe)

IV- Serveurs :

1- Sun SPARC (Incontournable alliance entre l'architecture et le système Solaris)
2- HP (Des serveurs robustes et puissants)
3- IBM (de ronommée mondiale)
4- Google (No comment)
5- DELL (L'un des trois premiers dans le monde)

V- Sites :

1- Google (meilleur moteur de recherche)
2- Sun.com (Une large base de données de tutoriaux et des trucs et astuces java et solaris)
3- Developpez.com (Pour les developpeurs francophones)
4- Reuters.com (meilleure agence d'informations)
5- Yahoo.com (le moteur de recherche redoutable)

VI- Informaticiens :

1- Don. E. Knuth (le génie d'algorithmique)
2- Alain Turing (Le fameux designer de l'ENIAC et l'auteur du test de turing.)
3- Linus Torvalds (le parrain de linux)
4- James Gosling (Le parrain de Java)
5- Von Neumann (le parrain de l'informatique moderne)

VII- Distributions linux :

1- Knoppix (Live CD complet et puissant)
2- Linux SuSE (celui que j'utilise, simple et intuitif)
3- Fedora (Le meilleur pour bien apprendre linux)
4- DamnSmallLinux (50 Mo de magie sur un live miniCD!)
5- Ubuntu (facile et surtout Africain)

Commentaires

Anonyme a dit…

c'est bien
mais pour le live cd t'a essayé Centos???

6 février 2008 à 20:21

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

GNS3: Simulating a 100% opensource site2site VPN using Wireguard, VyOS and OpenVSwitch

This is something I had in mind but didn't find the time to accomplish before. It just took a very cold day to convince me that I have to play with Wireguard on VyOS. I used GNS3 of course, on my personal Linux laptop to create this setup. Of course the performance was not that great since it is just a simulation. In real life, I am using Wireguard on a 10 years old Raspberry Pi Model B and amazingly with just a 700MHz single core ARM CPU and less than 512 MB of RAM I had a decent and stable permanent Wireguard tunnel. (My bandwidth would reach 24 Mbps without issue) Back to my simulation, this is what it looks like : Quick explanation: the VYOS routers labeled IPERF1 and IPERF2 are only used for an iperf3 test, which was able to reach about 50 to 60 Mbps each time. It ain't much but it was honest (and free) secure bandwidth! I won't get into the details of this setup but I will just post the two most important configurations : R-East and R-West : #### VYOS WireGuard Site...

GNS3 on Manjaro/Arch Linux: How to create virbr0 for NAT to work

Problem: You can't add a NAT connection to your GNS3 simulation, and you get the error : "ERROR template_manager:226 Error while creating node from template: NAT interface virbr0 is missing, please install libvirt" Steps to resolve: 1- Create a file named /tmp/default.xml 2- Paste this content and save: <network> <name>default</name> <bridge name="virbr0"/> <forward mode="nat"/> <ip address="192.168.123.1" netmask="255.255.255.0"> <dhcp> <range start="192.168.123.2" end="192.168.123.254"/> </dhcp> </ip> </network> 3- Execute the following commands in your shell : virsh net-define /tmp/default.xml sudo virsh net-start default sudo virsh net-autostart default

GNS3 vs VM: iperf3 test for VyOS

In my last post I tried to simulate a site2site VPN connection using Wireguard via VyOS, my favourite router. It was very easy to implement but the performance was not that great on GNS3. It was not a VyOS issue at all, GNS3 is just a simulation tool and we can't expect real world performance in it, even if it uses Qemu and Linux virtual networking for that end. To prove that, I made the following simple iperf3 test using 3 VyOS routers on GNS3 : No VPN, just simple routing via connected routes through VyOS1.3-3. The result was similar to my Wireguard throughput test, of course considering the header size of Wireguard packets : In my Wireguard test, I reached a bitrate of 53.8 Mbps, which is almost 76% of total bandwidth, and it's a good result, but I had to verify if VyOS is able to route at a greater bitrate. For just that, I created a VyOS VM on VirtualBox and connected two other VyOS VMs to it's interfaces, and made an iperf3 test. The result was clearly better : Reach...

HK blog

Rechercher dans ce blog